Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 5121 - 5140 of 29,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Matt Conigliaro
In this decision, the Second District said no, but it certified the following to the state supreme court as a question of great public importance: WHEN A PETITIONER CLEARLY ALLEGES DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE ON THE PART OF APPELLATE COUNSEL BASED ON CASE LAW IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE APPEAL THAT WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN RELIEF HAD APPELLATE COUNSEL RAISED THE ISSUE ON APPEAL BUT THE CASE LAW UPON WHICH THE PETITIONER BASES THE CLAIM IS SUBSEQUENTLY… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In this federal class action, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certified three questions centered on New York's statutory scheme for child protective proceedings. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
A strip club is not legally responsible for the severe injuries resulting when one of the club’s dancers, who was intoxicated, crashed into a car while driving home from work, an Ohio appeals court ruled on Friday. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:14 am
A Columbus attorney was able to clear one legal hurdle that previous challengers to the constitutionality of the state’s private JobsOhio development office could not, but she was derailed by another in a state appeals court. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:27 am by Tate Brown
First, the lawmakers claimed that “all of the orders issued by the three-judge district court regarding discovery” should be vacated because the court “lacked jurisdiction to hear” those claims. [read post]
The Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, finding that the Kansas Bill of Rights protected “the fundamental right to abortion. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Wrenn wasn’t one of those cases.) [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court said there were only ten offending meals, not enough to violate the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause.The Court of Appeals (Calabresi, Walker and Chin) says the jury may find plaintiff was given a pork diet on 63 occasions over the course of about seven months. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:11 pm
  (Indeed, the Second Circuit reiterated the level of detail it expects from district courts concerning role enhancements that are applied.) [read post]