Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 21,152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am
Camuso‘s holding is reminiscent of Congel v Malfitano, 31 NY3d 272 [2018]. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:43 am
Additional Resources: GEICO v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 10:07 am
Archer & White Sales Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Rather, the Court stated that “Section 10(b) reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
As recently as this Order to Show Cause, Defendant has stated — notably for the first time — that a sheriff’s sale would afford the opportunity to “consider trying to borrow money (if he could) and buy [the malpractice cause(s) of action] for himself in order to protect his former attorneys [*4](including a childhood friend) from frivolous and legally-baseless claims” (Def Memo at 16). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:05 pm
Benson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court sales tax ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
That possibility is the focus of Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:00 am
Wayfair, which overruled prior decisions holding that an out-of-state seller with no physical presence in the state could not be required to collect sales taxes on goods it ships to in-state consumers. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:39 am
[See GC2 Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) put an end to all suspense and resistance, stating it was perfectly legal for a contract to stipulate that the buyer bears the re-sale right royalty in the context of a sale between professionals, thereby siding with the CJEU (here). [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
A valued sales employee may have selling responsibility only on the west coast, but her company may be situated in New York or Florida. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:30 am
Foti Fuels, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:34 am
SEC and Lucia v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Had the statute not targeted federal land sales – and instead subjected all land sales to Lands Commission approval and rights of first refusal – there still would have been a question whether, in practice, the state law was imposing too much of a burden on federal operations. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
On October 14, 2014, Converse filed a complaint with the ITC alleging violations of section 337 by various respondents in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of shoes that infringe its trademark. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:55 am
Jason Howard, J.D.On the heels of the Supreme Court holding in Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:29 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. [read post]
