Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 5121 - 5140 of 5,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm by Susan Brenner
As I’ve explained in earlier posts, the 4th Amendment protects us from “unreasonable” searches and seizures. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:22 pm by Michael Lowe
Challenging the Search Warrant in Texas: Illegal Search and Seizure What is Probable Cause for Police to Arrest in Texas? [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal and related decisions released by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 6, 2021. [read post]
Transit police officers launched a sting operation to catch an alleged upskirter on a Boston trolley—a man who had been observed surreptitiously videotaping up the skirt of a woman sitting, facing him, across the aisle. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Berkos, No. 07-2294 Denials of motions to suppress and conviction for failure to pay child support are affirmed where: 1) a magistrate judge may properly issue a search warrant ordering the search and production of electronic evidence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 2703(a), where the warrant is directed to an out-of-state internet service provider; and 2) there was sufficient probable cause supporting a warrant to search defendant's home. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 12:30 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
  A DEA report has reported that both heroin and methamphetamine seizures have increased almost 300% in Arizona in the last five years. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:46 am by Charles Johnson
The Charles Johnson Law Firm is one of the foremost criminal defense law firms in Houston in defending people from drug convictions, including the possession and sale of marijuana. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm by anne
  Investigators traced the stolen funds through the BTC blockchain and successfully decrypted files obtained through a search warrant. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
New Jersey Dept. of Environmental ProtectionDocket: 10-388Issue(s): (1) Whether the evidence obtained by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection during an unannounced, warrantless inspection of wetlands in the backyard behind petitioners' home, over their repeated objections, should be suppressed because it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment; (2) whether the Fourth Amendment entitles petitioners to greater protection from warrantless searches and… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:13 am by KC Johnson
§ 1983 claim regarding the NTO requirement for DNA & blood samples, against various Duke & Durham employees—upheld against Gottlieb, Himan, and former SANE-nurse-in-training Tara Levicy Beaty concludes that the “Plaintiffs have raised substantial questions regarding the constitutionality of the searches and seizures effected pursuant to the NTO in this case, both as to the procedure that was followed and the scope of the NTO that was entered. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
District court's denial of motion to suppress the evidence seized after search of the boat is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) defendants did not consent to the search; and 2) the district court erred in its alternative determination that the search met the requirements of a border search. [read post]
20 May 2024, 12:34 pm by Michael Lowe
  They can get search warrants, for instance, in order to search someone’s home, office, car, storage facility, computer cloud storage, phone, and more as they try and find facts that may be argued as admissible evidence of a federal crime being committed. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 10:57 am by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  However, the Minnesota Supreme Court determined that the statute violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures in 2003. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal decisions released by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 20, 2021. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out Jones’s conviction, explaining that the use of the GPS device violated his right under the Fourth Amendment to be free of “unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]