Search for: "State v James" Results 5121 - 5140 of 9,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the February 16, February 23, March 2, March 16 and March 23 conferences; likely relisted after the March 29 conference)   James v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm by Scott Bomboy
The website Politico reported on Wednesday afternoon that a court spokesperson said the media will get notice between 60 minutes and 90 minutes before the findings and orders are announced from the three-judge panel that considered the case of State of Washington v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
It is the author's contention, moreover, that it is partly due to the "negative synergy" of judicial usurpation of the amendment processes that genuine amendments are far harder to secure today than when James Madison introduced his original list of twelve proposed amendments in 1789, of which ten promptly received sufficient state resolutions of ratifications to become the Bill of Rights of 1791. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:42 am
Congratulations to James Feldman for a well-plotted appeal. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am by Ben
 - And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:20 am by Ben
 - And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:04 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held a Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
But no UK patent ruling has ever been even remotely as controversial as Justice Colin Birss's 2017 holding in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]