Search for: "State v Richards" Results 5121 - 5140 of 8,999
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 6:34 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon In a post last week, we predicted that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Comcast v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by Sheldon Toplitt
A New York federal judge's summary judgment ruling last week held that although phonographophiles may unload their LPs at yard sales, a company that served as an online marketplace for used digital music infringed on the copyright of a record company.United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Richard Sullivan's 19-page decision in Capitol Records LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:37 pm by Cicely Wilson
”Read More: In key victory for James ‘Whitey’ Bulger, federal appeals court throws US District Court Judge Richard Stearns off caseNorthington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 8:08 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Bush, and counsel for the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Lord Neuberger, delivering the judgment of the Court, stated that whether a party was 'making' something was a "a matter of fact and degree". [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:22 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young Since the Supreme Court decided Dukes v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:12 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a major precedential decision in the case of Wiest v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:45 am by David Oscar Markus
This is Howard Srebnick and Richard Strafer's case dealing with whether a defendant is entitled to a pretrial hearing to challenge forfeiture. [read post]