Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
The first is Ahmed v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
The People) Viacom – Viacom, FAPL and Amici File briefs in Viacom v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:03 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
Harris v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
. ~~~ The State: New York The Case: In re: Ferrel L. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
Rapp was nominated for his excellent work in the mortgage fraud case of the U.S. v Bernadel, et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am
Rather than acknowledging a fiduciary’s consent as “lawful consent” under the federal statute (id.; see Ajemian v Yahoo! [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 8:52 am
Fontes, 111 F.4th 976, 980 n.1 (9th Cir. 2024) (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
He dismissed the claim for state immunity brought by the former King of Spain. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:30 pm
The case is District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:42 pm
Under current law, either a foreign or domestic patent holder may be able to obtain damages based on foreign uses of domestically-manufactured components of an infringing article. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:07 pm
In the meantime the European Court of Justice handed down its landmark judgment in Sabam v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:55 pm
[*Before you ask: FATCA is Title V of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act of 2010. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am
The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:04 am
As a supervisor or social superior (mentors, contract holders v. contractors, clients who need our help), our ask is often met with token compliance or a yes that is rooted in fearing negative consequences, e.g., will they fire me/end the contract/not represent me. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
Holders of medical marijuana cards are not subject to the trace law. [read post]
