Search for: "State v. Howes" Results 5121 - 5140 of 72,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am by Eric Goldman
Robins ruling as an example of how courts can require private property owners to honor California’s state constitution. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, similar rules apply in many states to private schools more generally; if a state bans discrimination in admission by such schools, which many states do, that brings with it similar restrictions on speech that creates a "hostile environment" (which would likely violate the First Amendment when applied to curriculum, see Runyon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm by Unknown
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies)Dossett v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 2:02 am by Michael DelSignore
Supreme Court has the final say on how the federal constitution (and federal legislation) is to be interpreted, whereas state supreme courts have the final word on how state law is to be interpreted. [read post]