Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 13,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
The Illinois Supreme Court first adopted the doctrine that newly constructed homes come with an implied warranty of habitability in 1979 in Petersen v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:33 pm
” Indeed, Justice Valihura noted that Vice Chancellor Laster, in an immediate post-trial reaction, stated that “the credibility of the people on the [B]oard” was “very, very strong. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
(FTC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
The May 31, 2016 cert petition in the case of Fried v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
The Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit of the state of Illinois has affirmed a judgment in Estate of Stanley Cora v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:18 am
In Henry Schein v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:18 am
In Henry Schein v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
Jordan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:16 am
–State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
Pharmacy, price advertising for pharmaceuticals. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
"On the importance of technical innovation relative to design, I like the following passage from the brief:"To state the obvious, the investment in research and development for information and communication technologies—currently estimated at $250 billion annually—extends well beyond design to include the hardware, software, and services that are incorporated into the technological products. [...] [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:41 am
McFeeley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 8:35 am
Prominent takings expert Robert Thomas has a summary of the decision at the Inverse Condemnation blog: [T]he North Carolina Supreme Court has issued an opinion in an important case we’ve been following for a long time, Kirby v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:10 pm
In her decision in Wong v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
That happened in North Carolina, where the state’s cyberbullying law was considered in State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Park, University of California, Los Angeles , on Friday, June 3, 2016 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Federalism, Investor protection, Misconduct, Rule 10b-5, Securities Act, Securities fraud, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, SOX, State law, Stock mispricing Remarks on Optimizing the Equity Markets Posted by Mary Jo White, U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm
Berg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:52 am
With the exception of the Eleventh Circuit, the petitioner says, every circuit to address the issue has concluded that a corporation's insider status gives rise to a duty to disclose (Fried v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:18 am
The $399-million damage award against Samsung, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Apple v. [read post]
