Search for: "State v. So"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 117,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2015, 4:03 am
California decision last year, which barred police from searching smartphones when they arrest someone without a warrant....So deep was the shadow cast by the social issue cases this year that virtually no one paid attention to Johnson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
On December 1, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:04 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court took an unexpected turn in its second civil decision of Friday morning, using State Bank of Cherry v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:14 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:34 am
But now there is one caveat—companies do not have to do so when the warrant relates to an out of state abortion investigation. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:42 am
So as you can see, there are differences between how juvenile cases are handled in Nebraska and South Dakota. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:26 pm
In this latest chapter in a hundred-year litigation history, see Nevada v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
So what's the right answer here? [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Chief Justice Roberts recused himself, so the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
So I'll admit I was more than a little scared. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
So I'll admit I was more than a little scared. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:57 am
The State of Georgia does allow its citizens to consider both options. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:46 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in four cases this afternoon. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
A visiting Texas district judge thinks so (as do two members of the Ninth).United States v. [read post]
