Search for: "State v. Washington" Results 5121 - 5140 of 17,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
Owens, and Jesinoski v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
That's the title of a report in today's Washington Post on the aftermath of the Supreme Court's ruling in  Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
The case involves a roughly one-acre strip of land in Washington state, which the Lundgren family contends they acquired by adverse possession from a larger tract of land later acquired by the Upper Skagit tribe. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The dust continues to settle from Wednesday’s argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:08 am by Lawrence Solum
These two doctrinal goals are in clear conflict in Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
The petition in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Kiera Flynn
United States, Smith v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, here; United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 3:46 pm by Josh Blackman
I, for one, am not fully persuaded that school pupils are wise enough, even with this Court's expert help from Washington, to run the 23,390 public school systems in our 50 States. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:50 pm
The State Department's practice of offering courts a "Suggestion of Immunity" to express its views came under review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the matter Habyarimana v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:03 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Washington, 56 M.J. 352 (C.A.A.F. 2002) 5. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am by Lyle Denniston
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]