Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 19,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm
ShareIn 2003, a divided Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm
Unsurprisingly (see my post-argument analysis), that pattern held true in today’s decision in Manuel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
Even if the inmates can count on four votes from the Court’s more liberal Justices (and it certainly seemed like they can), they still need at least one more vote to win. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
In my forthcoming piece on Panetti and the future of the Eighth Amendment, I argue that the Court's reasoning in Panetti v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:46 am
If the Department of Justice declines to prosecute the FCA claim, the relator is still free to prosecute the claim on its own. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Schutte v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 10:22 am
” First, the Court held in Loper Bright v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:30 am
In the leading case of the three petitions the justices declined to review Tuesday, the lower court opinion urged the Supreme Court to end the confusion of whether that older case does indeed still hold in the internet age. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:48 am
Reporting on the Supreme Court's Nov. 28th decision in In Aaron Reid v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
The Court built upon its 2007 holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” At NPR, Tim Mak reports that “Christine Blasey Ford is still being harassed after leveling sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, her lawyers say. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:57 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
: Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union | Book review (and discount code!) [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm
But, in the larger scheme of things, he still wins. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 10:56 am
My current "No" now still means "No. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Lord Neuberger gave the judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In 1896, in Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:40 pm
Review Denied (with dissenting justices) Sacramento Regional Transit District v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
That case, along with People v Harris (from the Muskegon Circuit Court) and People v Parks (Ingham County)were granted leave for further appeal. [read post]
