Search for: "T-7 Inc" Results 5121 - 5140 of 8,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Smyczek, in which he stated that document N2 was distributed and made available to everyone freely at the ASBC Conference held on 7-11 June 1987. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:20 am
In re Wasser, Serial No. 87487916 (June 7, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Morris v County of Nassau, 158 AD3d at 632, quoting Matter of Dolce v Nassau County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, 7 NY3d 492, 498). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Household Int'l, Inc.: "The realistic alternative to a class action is not 17 million individual suits, but zero individual suits, as only a lunatic or a fanatic sues for $30." [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:57 pm by Bexis
  "[S]ince the FDA rejected Defendant’s PAS, it would not have approved a CBE seeking to add the same language to the label that it just rejected in the PAS." [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
“Let’s be clear: there is no reason temporary or on-demand workers who work flexible hours, or even minutes at a time can’t be treated like other employees in New Jersey or any other state. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
 ["Though your ice cream will have probably melted by the time you get to the end of the judgment," chortles Merpel, but the AmeriKat thinks that if that is so, you just aren't eating fast enough.]Lord Justice Floyd  - not impressedwith pleading points on appealCourt of Appeal rules for ASSIA's patents in BT Infinity broadband case: Yesterday morning, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the patent infringement case brought by Adaptive Spectrum… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Brine, Inc., 85 F.3d 1002, 1011 (2d Cir. 1996), for this proposition.Plaintiff also has to prove these adverse actions took place because her race. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:43 am by John L. Welch
[T]he only thing which was exchanged in the transaction was the mark and the 'goodwill of the business appurtenant to and connected with the Mark,' in return for which All-Glass recited receipt of nominal consideration. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:34 am
See, e.g., Omaha Steaks, 128 USPQ2d at 1693 (“[t]he purpose of introducing evidence of third-party use is to show that customers have become so conditioned by a plethora of such similar marks that customers have been educated to distinguish between different [such] marks on the bases of minute distinctions. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:51 am by John Jascob
UBS Financial Services, Inc. (19-249): Whether the grant of an employee stock option is a “sale” of a security under the Securities Act of 1933.Isaacson/Weaver Family Trust v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
PFI also claimed that section 2(a) was void under the Fifth Amendment, specifically for being too vague, therefore preventing a person in discerning what is prohibited and what isn't. [read post]