Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 55,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2007, 7:28 am
A potentially groundbreaking legal battle over Connecticut's exclusion of gay people from the state's marriage law has catapulted the debate over same-sex marriage to a new level. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:48 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
Court Upholds New Jersey Law Prohibiting Job Ads Requiring Job Applicants Who Are Currently Employed
30 Jan 2014, 4:45 am
Accordingly, in New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:31 am
Federal law bars gun possession by felons, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
The Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: A Comparison," Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 4 (2017) [full-text]"An Examination of the Comprehensive Plan of Action as a Response to Mass Influx of 'Boat People': Lessons Learnt for a Comprehensive Approach to Migration by Sea," Chapter in Boat Refugees' and Migrants at Sea: A Comprehensive Approach (Brill, 2016) [full-text via Academia.edu]"The Future… [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
I can't say it any better than Judge Reinhardt, who authors the opinion:"As an "attempt" in the state of California requires only "slight acts in furtherance of the [criminal] design," People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Its 5-4 ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 3:04 am
The People". [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:34 am
These people are shut out of the power game - superior talent notwithstanding - because opening the game up to all would put an end to affirmative action for the elite. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
And the articles themselves: Administering Patent Law, Jason Rantanen Rigorous Policy Pilots: Experimentation in the Administration of the Law, Colleen V. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 7:31 pm
Nationwide Credit, Inc., E.D.Cal.2009, 256 F.R.D. 684), persons in the custody of law enforcement (see People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
That, it seems to me, is an interesting question, one relevant to both law and morality. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:01 pm
International Strategies v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Judge VanDyke has a point here.The question is whether the Cal Expo fairgrounds in Sacramento are a public forum sufficient to allow people to distribute First Amendment literature therein. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm
Lewis based his ruling on an analysis of the state’s no-fault law dating back to 1974, when the Florida Supreme Court in a landmark case [Lasky v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am
Supreme Court’s Decision in Jam v. [read post]
