Search for: "U.S. Judiciary" Results 5121 - 5140 of 11,662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Jubelirer (2004)—to hold that because “excessive” partisanship is not an idea that courts can translate into administrable doctrine, the federal judiciary should not wade into these kinds of cases at all. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 7:55 am by Ilya Somin
Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump holds a rally with supporters in San Diego, California, U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
(I am, of course, leaving out the ugly racial aspects of this history, which certainly deserve to be discussed in a separate column – or book.)The contrast with the recent situation in the U.S. could not be more worrisome. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:35 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Judicial discipline at the federal level is outlined in the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:32 am by Melissa Jacoby
  How would Chief Justice Roberts manage the risk imposed on the judiciary if section 308 becomes law? [read post]
25 May 2016, 4:49 am by Dean Freeman
Johnson, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, argued that these contracts are inherently unfair. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:20 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Johnson’s measure is supported by lawmakers from across the U.S., and he urged his colleagues in the House Judiciary Committee to approve his bill, which would do away with mandatory arbitration as a resolution for civil rights and injury lawsuits. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Bob Goodlatte press release, Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Dan Lungren testimony, U.S. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:00 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Tuesday, May 24th at 2 pm: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on The U.S. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:13 pm by Elliot Harmon
Chuck Grassley, I work at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), an organization that fights for digital rights in the U.S. and abroad. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
Rather than argue that this reading of Zivotofsky I is the best interpretation of that case, in this post I'm going to review U.S. appellate court political question jurisprudence since Zivotofsky I and ask if that case changed the lower courts' analysis. [read post]