Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 8,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
”[7] Additionally, the jury found that Apple had not infringed on any Samsung utility patents. [8] Lastly, the jury found that Samsung’s monopolizing of markets related to the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) standard did not violate antitrust law. [9] In the end, Samsung was ordered to pay $1.05 billion ($1,049,393,540 to be exact) in damages to Apple.[10] In Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
NNH-CV14-6043935-S, Short v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
However, a covered contractor does not have to automatically go back and universally embed new EEO clauses into its existing (i.e. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
In the early 1950s, the plaintiffs in the Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
Hickman (Minnesota) presents Administering the Tax System We Have, 63 Duke L.J. ___ (2014) at the University of St. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
Smart Charts – Allow you to compare the law and regs across states. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
One such for me is Sexual Minorities Uganda v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
It is impossible to write a rule or law that perfectly and permanently fits the ever-changing state of communications technology. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:05 pm
University of Ill. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:51 am
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Commissioner (1989) and United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
To apply this approach, I first looked at decisions from Illinois and New Mexico, two jurisdictions that use universal citation to release opinions digitally in final citable form, opinions that themselves cite the states’ own precedent using official system citations without parallel references to the NRS. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
Saudi Arabia, and now Jones v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
This is most notable in West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
