Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 66,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 5:31 pm
Allegations involve how officials used funds received from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life as well as a settlement agreement entered into by the state regarding absentee ballots. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
EFF is weighing in on People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
" The court said that in its reaching that conclusion it expressed "no view on whether any of the Diocese's defenses are meritorious" and "the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to that Court with direction to remand to DHR for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion".* The Court of Appeals' decision noted the "ministerial exception is a doctrine grounded in the First Amendment to the Constitution of… [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
" The court said that in its reaching that conclusion it expressed "no view on whether any of the Diocese's defenses are meritorious" and "the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to that Court with direction to remand to DHR for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion".* The Court of Appeals' decision noted the "ministerial exception is a doctrine grounded in the First Amendment to the Constitution of… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 5:16 pm
They were not yet legally married, and the will did not contain a clause stating it was in contemplation of marriage. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
The Fifth Day, LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:10 pm
In which case it could legitimately say: "Well, that's a stupid rule." [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
In the recent case of Gale v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Judicial Administration of the Relationship Between States and the General Government—A Legalization of Federalism --Bond v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:28 am
The government may choose not to subsidize the exercise of the right to discriminatory expressive association, even when the discrimination is perfectly well-motivated, just as the government may choose not to subsidize electioneering or substantial amounts of lobbying, even though such electioneering or lobbying may be perfectly well-motivated. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Dean v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:28 pm
In Sokolovskiy v. [read post]
Defendant's own testimony established standing; court reminds Government of Simmons, for some reason
31 Oct 2007, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
