Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 10,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Crimes such as these are prosecuted by the Attorney General’s, District Attorney’s, or United States Attorney’s Office. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
Bruen, in which the court struck down New York’s handgun-licensing scheme, the justices will hear argument in another major gun-rights case: United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
"Bill" Lee of WilmerHale. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:20 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife Serv., 586 U. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:35 am
United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In the wake of NFIB v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), for the first time ever in America's history the United States Supreme Court held that the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution protects and individuals right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am
And the Boston Globe reported on the responses of states whose laws forbid corporate campaign donations prior to Citizens United. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:22 pm
Shaw,15 CV 3738 (ARR) (CLP), where United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of New York, Cheryl L. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:22 pm
Shaw,15 CV 3738 (ARR) (CLP), where United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of New York, Cheryl L. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:43 am
The decision is here: Vanguard-v-Huchon.pdf. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
(SGI) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 10:05 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
