Search for: "California Physicians" Results 5141 - 5160 of 5,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2006, 11:38 am
In California, caps instituted in the late 1970's had little effect. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:08 am
On further appeal to the California Supreme Court, the FDA submitted a second amicus brief in the same case making the same arguments. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 9:39 pm
Another inmate with a documented history of alcholism and seizures went without physician or nursing care. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:45 pm by J. Mitchell
One of the favorite arguments of the proponents of caps of damages is the alleged increased cost of physician premiums which they erroneously suggest  are caused by big money payouts. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:45 pm
One of the favorite arguments of the proponents of caps of damages is the alleged increased cost of physician premiums which they erroneously suggest  are caused by big money payouts. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 6:00 pm
In October, thieves in California stole a laptop computer from a company employee which contained, information such as the name, gender, date of birth, member identification numbers and physician information of approximately 38,000 members of Kaiser Permanent Colorado. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 9:10 pm
 We set the sentencing date far enough in advance to obtain a written opinion from our medical marijuana expert, David Bearman, MD, of Goleta, California. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:31 am
Another exception is California, where passage in 1988 of Proposition 103 requiring stringent rate regulation finally got premiums under control. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 2:59 am
The federal statute at issue in the cases argued yesterday imposes criminal penalties on "[a]ny physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 5:06 pm
Qualified patients must possess a physician's recommendation to use cannabis and must register with the state Department of Health. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:37 pm
California law requires the mandatory use of a helmet for any person 17 years of age or under who is riding upon a bike or bicycle on a public street or bikeway or path. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 10:00 pm
" and concludes that the physician's role is to "relate to our patients as they go through life and not treat them as a project to complete. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 9:55 pm
" and concludes that the physician's role is to "relate to our patients as they go through life and not treat them as a project to complete. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 6:23 pm
Kaiser Hospital Dedicates Memorial To Domestic Violence Victims, Mercurynews.com, October 4, 2006 Domestic Violence, American College of Emergency Physicians Domestic Violence Facts, Safestate.org Related Web Resources: California Domestic Violence Hotlines Know Your Rights: Domestic Violence, abanet.org [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
October 13, 2006Re: Reposting A Blog On An American Third Party.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 9:44 pm
Spindel, Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, P.C. 2005-2006 Long Term Care Year In ReviewCompiled by Health Lawyers' LongTerm Care Practice Group 2005-2006 Medical Staff, Credentialing, and Peer Review Year InReviewCompiled by Health Lawyers' Medical Staff, Credentialing, and PeerReview Practice Group Current Topics Corporate Governance GAO Releases Survey Results Of NonprofitHospitals' Executive Compensation Practices ERISA Eleventh Circuit Upholds Dismissal Of State Law Claims… [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 1:52 pm
Physicians California Appeals Court Rejects Physician's Retaliatory Eviction And Suspension Claims Against Hospital California Supreme Court Holds Hospital Could File Anti-SLAPP Motion To Strike Complaint Arising From Peer Review Proceedings [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
Analyzing the disruptive physician: how state and federal courts should handle whistleblower cases brought by disruptive physicians. 44 Duq. [read post]
9 Jul 2006, 10:00 am
Recall the 2002 Ninth Circuit decision that First Amendment rights of physicians meant the federal government couldn't revoke the drug licenses of California physicians who recommended marijuana to their patients (Conant v. [read post]