Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 27,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
McNutt, 62 M.J. 16, 20 (C.A.A.F. 2005).Mil. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:53 pm
Apr. 20, 2012). [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:11 am
But it also appears that a dollar spent on police may be 20% more effective than a dollar spent on incarceration. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 4:37 am
Regulation 14(1) of the Takeover Regulations required Daiichi to make an open offer for Ranbaxy within four days of the agreement. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Held, in Etheton LJ's lead judgment: 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Held, in Etheton LJ's lead judgment: 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:56 pm
(This should have been Step 1.)7. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:01 am
Notes:[1] W. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
This statement, however, does not necessarily imply that the final desired coating thickness on both sides must be different. [1.1.7] Claim 1 of the main request is therefore not allowable. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 12:00 am
How Does USCIS Intend to Prevent “Flooding” the System? [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 20, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Ct., Harris Cty., Tex., Feb. 10, 2020), pp. 20, 22, 23; see also Reply Brief 3, n. 1, 4, n. 2 (listing recent disclosures and investigations supporting these allegations). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
According to this communication (hereafter: "communication A") the examination had been carried out on the claims of the sole request submitted with the applicant's letter of 20 November 2008. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:33 am
On March 20, 2020 the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) published a Declaratory Ruling confirming that the COVID-19 pandemic is an “emergency” that qualifies for the TCPA’s “emergency purposes” exception. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:58 am
September 1995 - Lettuce (romaine) E. coli O157:H7; 20 reported cases in Idaho 4. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
What does that mean? [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
It does not permit consolidation of the employee count across multiple entities. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:45 pm
The above mentioned hypothetical does not take into account the downward departures or the 3553 factors that can impact a defendants sentence. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 6:45 pm
§2252(b)(1) 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:09 am
The Court was sharply divided, 4-3, in favour of dismissing the taxpayer's appeal from the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal.The Lipsons engaged in a series of transactions over two days in 1994 in which they made use of various rules, including the spousal rollover rule (section 73), the spousal attribution rule (section 74.1), and the back-to-back loans rule (subsection 20(3)), to transform what would otherwise have been non-deductible mortgage interest under… [read post]
