Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 5,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:52 am
Huon v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
As soon as you start saying it’s private party v. private party, must go to Article III. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
In lieu of our regular Friday feature—the Week in Review—The Regulatory Review is recapping some of the top regulatory news from the past year, including the coronavirus pandemic, the 2020 presidential election, and more. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm
Fearing that this would deter ISPs from screening offensive material, Section 230 was added late in the law-making process. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 1:55 am
Editor’s note: This article is part of a new series from leading experts with practical solutions to democratic backsliding, polarization, and political violence. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Interestingly, Nollan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
L. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:55 am
But I take it that we'd be concerned that the following examples—even if cast just as examples of what might be useful as evidence of discriminatory intent—are likely to (and probably intended to) deter people from expressing their political views about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am
In yet another U.S. securities class action lawsuit involving a non-U.S. company and a corruption investigation in the company’s home country, on March 19, 2015 a shareholder of Chemical & Mining Company of Chile, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
But I take it that we'd be concerned that the following examples—even if cast just as examples of what might be useful as evidence of discriminatory intent—are likely to (and probably intended to) deter people from expressing their political views about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 1:59 pm
This faulty reasoning shows up in the district court opinion in Salinger v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
And even adopting a Pollyanna outlook won't convince us that such a law would deter women from having affairs. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
