Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 21,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2017, 2:37 pm
See, for example, Phelps v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
").Further, Staples has not shown that the constitutional issue is so clear that the panel should have acted sua sponte to strike down a state statute, without the required notice to the state attorney general. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
In City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:18 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm
Cobalt Brands, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
A wage-hour class action, the plaintiffs also sought relief under California's Private Attorney General Act, or PAGA, which allows recovery of penalties on behalf of the named plaintiff and other, unnamed, aggrieved employees. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm
”- “What does it mean to be an at-will employee? [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 12:01 pm
Judge Milan SmithUnited States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
Consequently, the doctrine of continuous representation does not apply, and Supreme Court erred in denying the motion (see Gotay v Brietbart, 12 NY3d 894; see generally Young v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(IP Spotlight) General – Patents PCT and EP filings on the rise again (Patent Docs) Global – Trade Marks / Brands How does it feel to be commoditised? [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm
In Lu v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
Menedez’s case is Acting Attorney General Whitaker - for now. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:13 am
” ** The Attorney General has opined that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant to §§80 and 80-a (1976 Opinions of the Attorney General 7; see, also, O'Reilly v Nedelka, 212 A.D.2d 714). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 4:49 am
Cohen, former personal attorney and self-described “fixer” for Donald J. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
What Carmack allegedly did so clearly does not fit within the definition of forgery (and, consequently, of the possession of forgery devices) it seems peculiar that the New York Attorney General's office would have brought the charges. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:30 am
Overton v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:01 pm
" In People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
We reiterated that to determine whether a search occurs when law enforcement uses tracking technology to which a physical trespass on a defendant's property does not apply, we apply the test set forth in Katz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm
The presence of an intervening step does not, as a general rule, by itself preclude standing. [read post]
