Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm
In July, the General Assembly enacted S.L. 2024-43 (H 25), legislation that makes three significant changes to the laws governing driving by person following a conviction for driving while impaired (DWI) and certain related offenses. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm
Evaluating systems of emission reduction is what EPA does. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:00 am
In short, the direct acquisition and management of habitat, where adequately funded, does appear to help many species. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:55 am
What does this mean? [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 7:57 pm
Schrank that otherwise does not make sense to me. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 7:36 am
Roberts certainly does not say so explicitly. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:47 pm
But it does not include a power to revise clear statutory terms that turn out not to work in practice. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 10:41 am
But calling an election unfair does not make it so. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:37 am
It does, however, deploy a powerful use of capitalization in the Table of Contents ("Texas IS likely to prevail"). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
Does it matter if we assume that Trump's speech would be protected? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
See generally Frank H. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 11:27 am
We will ensure that the executive does not impose any constraints upon economic activity which Congress has not authorized; and that where constraints are authorized the executive follows statutorily prescribed procedures and that the executive (and, much more rarely, Congress in its prescriptions) follows constitutionally required procedures. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
This does not include the most recent and frequently cited example, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who was nominated by Ronald Reagan in November 1987 to fill a vacancy and won confirmation from a Democratic-controlled Senate in February 1988. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm
Does this skepticism of Chevron affect judicial decisions? [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 11:19 am
The problem is that almost anything a candidate does can be interpreted as intended to "influence an election," from buying a good watch to make sure he gets to places on time, to getting a massage so that he feels fit for the campaign trail, to buying a new suit so that he looks good on a debate stage. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 5:33 pm
On the one hand, the Supreme Court reassures plaintiffs that its caselaw "does not require a case directly on point for a right to be clearly established. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:51 am
” STEPHANOPOULOS: And the “Heller” decision also does say there can be some restrictions. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:12 am
AEDPA “provides a remedy for instances in which a state court unreasonably applies this Court’s precedent; it does not require state courts to extend that precedent or license federal courts to treat the failure to do so as error. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:04 pm
Gomez, for instance, the court decided 6-3 that an unaccepted settlement offer of the maximum statutory penalty does not moot a plaintiff’s. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:10 am
Schumer’s explanation does not face the laugh test. [read post]
