Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 5141 - 5160 of 12,803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 7:06 am by Eric Schweibenz
  See generally our April 6, 2010 and March 29, 2010 posts for further details on the claim preclusion issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:13 am by Matrix Law
However, paragraph 1 of Schedule 10 to VATA gives a taxable person an option to tax transactions relating to a particular parcel of land. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A 112(2) does not apply, even by analogy, since R 109(3) “otherwise provides”. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R., 2017 CMAC 2 (37701) Does s.130 (1)(a) of the National Defence Act violate s. 11(f) of the Charter. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 6:00 pm by Corbin Bridge
However, it is necessary to have a thorough understanding of the Internal Revenue Code or a knowledgeable intermediary when executing this strategy. [1] 1031 Exchange Glossary | 1031 Tax Deferred Exchange Definitions | Terms for Section 1031 Tax Deferred Like Kind Exchanges | EXETER 1031 Exchange Services, LLC |, http://www.exeter1031.com/1031_exchange_glossary.aspx#top (last visited Mar 15,… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
The hearing took place on 29 and 31 October before Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulsen. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:21 am by PaulKostro
Criminal mischief originally appeared on NJ Family Issues on August 29, 2012. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:54 am by Dennis Crouch
Claim 46 of the '623 is a broad claim in that it does not not require the administration step (step 1 from above). [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:24 am
On April 29, the presiding judge in the matter, Christopher Conner of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:41 am by emagraken
” [29] The Act provides a complete code regarding the duty of an occupier of land. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:10 am
Sessions (Criminal): Monday through Friday - 9:00am & 1:30pm; (Traffic) Monday and Wednesday - 1:30pm & 4:30pm and Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 9:00am & 1:30pm. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Despite this omission, the specifications in Watson were also legally sufficient at the time of trial (the sentence was adjudged on January 29, 2010). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:07 am by MBettman
The certified question was “does the holding in  Lakewood v. [read post]