Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
Merpel wonders how other EU Member States have been handling 'failure-to-give-notice' damages and account of profit claims: is there a best-buy jurisdiction for those who fail to give notice of intention to import? [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm
” The Supreme Court “reaffirmed these First Amendment principles in Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department (see Rosalind English’s post) that a full internet ban placed upon a terrorist suspect subject to a control order (a highly restrictive anti-terrorism power) was lawful. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm
With this in mind, today in our discussion of FCC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:42 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (see Rosalind English’s post) that a full internet ban placed upon a terrorist suspect subject to a control order (a highly restrictive anti-terrorism power) was lawful. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
International Harvester, Inc., 718 F.2d 88, 96 (3d Cir.1983); United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Knox v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
They state that, “It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for prosecution. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
The Secretary of State for Justice v RB & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1608 (20 December…. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:02 am
V. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
In Guzzo v Cristofano, 2011 WL 6934108 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
Following the publications complained of he felt compelled to, and did, make a formal announcement as to his true state of health both to the Board of the Company and to its workforce [43]. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
The CJEU has ruled that Member States must be recognised as having “some discretion” in that respect. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am
United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:29 pm
" Feder v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:15 am
Even the State of Utah has gotten in on the act, revising its version of Rule 26 to require that all discovery meet the standards of proportionality. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In his famous speech to the English House of Commons in 1841, Thomas Babington Macaulay said: The advantages arising from a system of copyright are obvious. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
