Search for: "English v. English" Results 5141 - 5160 of 11,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 10:00 am by Ronald Mann
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY:  The Court this week in Freeman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
See Rosalind English’s post on the report findings here. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
In such cases, the principle has been accepted that an English court might be obliged to refuse to co-operate with a non-contracting state if to do so would be a “flagrant breach of Article 6”. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 pm
Maybe something you'd see in a really fractious university English Department or something. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
In the UK, a very successful campaign spear-headed by Index on Censorship and English Pen has been demanding reform to the English law of defamation. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
Clause 15 (English version, 22 January 2019) Some of our Services allow you to upload, submit, store, send or receive content. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:48 am by Florian Mueller
In any event, I published an unofficial English translation of Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems& Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm by Isabel McArdle
Sinclair Collis Limited, The Members of National Association of Cigarette Machine Operators (Interested Party) v Secretary of State for Health [2010] EWHC 3112 (Admin) – Read judgment or Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision The High Court has ruled that the Secretary of State for Health did not breach the human right to peaceful enjoyment of property or European Union law by banning the sale of tobacco products from automatic vending machines. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Hale's proposition was relatively uncontroversial throughout the Commonwealth for several centuries, although several English judges did express some reservations about it over the years; for instance, in R v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23. [read post]