Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Lymas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:31 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down its eagerly awaited judgment in Case C-438/05 International Transport Workers' Federation & The Finnish Seamen's Union v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:38 pm
It's been settled at least since the Court decided Ford v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:40 am
I have finally finished reading SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd (the IPKat beat me to it). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 5:39 am
Fortis Corporate Insurance v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
" Here is the IPKat's translation of the German version of the ECJ's response in eis.de (Case C-91/09) -- this Kat has checked: Curia still does not offer an English translation and probably never will... [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
In Summers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:31 pm
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
In Buck v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:02 am
Qualcomm and Apple v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:27 pm
Sparhawk v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patentThe on-going saga between Eli Lilly and Actavis regarding Lilly's pemetrexed disodium product has kept the English courts busy for years. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
This is contrary to the normal position under English law that once final relief is granted, parties are not entitled to come back to court. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
Glucksberg, Timbs v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
Pollock F and Maitland FW, History of English law Before the Time of King Edward (The Law Book Exchange 2007 [originally published as 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press 1898]). [read post]
