Search for: "In Re William S." Results 5141 - 5160 of 10,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
Case In Point - http://bit.ly/HM288p (Tom Fishburne) Technology and Tactics3 Steps for Compliance With the SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule – http://bit.ly/P5E8g3 (Alexandra Wrange) An Interesting Framework For Information Governance - http://bit.ly/Tvbn2B (Barry Murphy) Big Data’s Human Component – Harvard Business Review - http://bit.ly/PeXS0G (Jim Stikeleather) DOJ Is Prosecuting Customs Fraud Through… [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
The ban was on any necklace worn in a way that was visible (in Eweida’s case) or which could be grabbed by a patient (in Chaplin’s case). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
Williams, Ninth Circuit: The district court erred in grouping together appellant's convictions for wire fraud, extortion, and destruction of a letter box for purposes of sentencing under U.S.S.G. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 1:11 pm by Evan Schaeffer
" That's William Gaddis, the novelist, whose lawyers are comic too. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 1:11 pm by Evan Schaeffer
" That's William Gaddis, the novelist, whose lawyers are comic too. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Gwynne Monahan
For today’s Friday Five, she has five reasons you’re going to love it. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Gwynne Monahan
For today’s Friday Five, she has five reasons you’re going to love it. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:08 pm
Sure, if you're in jail, maybe it's not a big deal to steal from another inmate. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Here's more in the continuing "Year in Review" series, catching up on more of my backlog of twitter posts of case developments in the past 12 months. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:03 pm by Michael Madison
(For a pop culture reference here, take William Hurt in The Big Chill (1983): “Nick: You’re so analytical. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am by David Bernstein
Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy (1992); William E. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:38 am by SHG
  Of course they're prejudicial, which is why they're in evidence, but that can't be blamed on the press.Worse still, the ruling belies the emptiness of one of our beloved legal fictions, that the judge's instructions to the jury not to read about the case or discuss it outside the courtroom matters. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:32 pm by Christopher Danzig
Now they’re getting divorced. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:32 pm by Christopher Danzig
Now they’re getting divorced. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:30 am by Richard Pildes
  Instead, to be on the safe side of modern constitutional doctrine, which had changed dramatically since Congress had last re-visited Section 5 in 1982, I urged Congress to assess where voting problems were occurring today and tailor Section 5 accordingly. [read post]