Search for: "Kat"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 6,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
– see Kat posts on the Internet Court and on blockchain in China: Do China's Internet Courts work entirely online? [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:46 am
Readers of this weblog who litigate patents in the old Europe may recall a series of past posts on the subject of litigating patents under the experimental, not quite hatched and [in this Kat's opinion] arguably not even half-baked Unified Patent Court (UPC) system that has been created for the new Europe, with its fascinating new collection of Rules. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
On a rainy Friday morning in New York at the Fordham IP Conference, the first patents session on the patent track was on Biologics and Biosimilars, moderated by John Lee (Gilbert + Tobin, Sydney).Over to guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons), who reports on the session:"Cordula Schumacher (Arnold Ruess, Düsseldorf) kicked off the session by introducing the subject matter: “Biologics” are large, highly complex molecules produced by living cells and… [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 11:30 pm
[This Kat agrees, this is totally unacceptable, there is a plethora of female experts in IP that could have contributed. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Only one person really understands it, and that's fellow Kat Neil -- and even he isn't so sure about what it actually means]. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 5:40 pm
Failure to check the facts, statistics and quotes featured in the material that one reproduces risks repeating their errors”.After reading Professor Bauman’s reaction, this Kat became intrigued by what the acknowledged academic meant by “private ownership of knowledge”. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
Writes Roland: In two separate judgments but conjoined appeals, the Court of Appeal reversed previous decisions to cancel Cadbury's UK registration for the colour purple [critically reviewed by the AmeriKat here] and upheld the cancellation of Mattel's UK registration for a Scrabble tile [warmly welcomed by guest Kat Kate here]. [read post]
22 May 2017, 2:54 am
Kat-miningAt the time of unveiling its Digital Single Market Strategy in May 2015, the EU Commission linked the establishment of a fully connected digital single market to the objective of creating a favourable environment for European start-ups and SMEs. [read post]
EPO maintains ST.26 sequence listing requirement for divisionals but compromises on excess page fees
27 Oct 2023, 2:15 am
In the emerging era of large language model (LLM) assisted patent drafting and prosecution (IPKat), it is remarkable to this Kat that there is no better solution to the current approach for processing the sequences disclosed in a patent application (IPKat). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
This Kat does not understand the Iron & Smith judgment to mean that a well-known trade mark is deemed to be infringed in the entire EU simply because the mark is known and the infringement took place in a substantial part of the EU. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Coincidentally, it's also the second Scottish post in a row that this Kat erroneously assumed was about Scotch whisky -- this being because its author is the excellent Lindesay Low, who is Senior Legal Counsel to the Scotch Whisky Association. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
A noticeable exception to this is the reinstatement time period change, where clarity, certainty and objectivity of procedure trumped consistency with the practice of other offices.This Kat would like to thank his colleague at EIP Daniel Richards for his help in summarising these changes. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:27 am
Can Kats come to the wedding? [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
.* The fact that revocation proceedings have been brought against a trade mark does not prevent the proprietor of that mark from using it.This Kat thinks that this is an unsurprising outcome, but one that should serve as a reminder to everyone that genuine use is not just a state of mind but something that has to be proved on the basis of credible evidence. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:02 am
and elsewhere, especially in the US [here, here, here ...].Of course, being a data protection case, comments have focused on the perhaps little known right to be forgotten, also known as right to oblivion. ... but also the right to be forgiven (and forgotten), explains JamesBeing oblivious to anything some things if not copyright-related, this Kat tried to think and see whether this CJEU judgment might have something to say also copyright-wise, especially… [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:40 am
The decision is yet to be made available, but we have the relevant press release [UPDATE @10:38am: the judgment is now available here]BackgroundAs readers will remember, the background national proceedings concern a (Kat-free) calendar that was distributed during a public event on New Years Eve 2011, and whose cover reproduced a modified version of the cover to a well-known Suske en Wiske 1991 comic book in order to illustrate the ideas of Flemish nationalist… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
The first four reports in the series are* "A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court" (June 2014, here), * "A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part II" (October 2014, here),* "A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part III"" (25 February 2015, here)* "A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part IV" (20 May 2015, here)Courtesy of Bristows, the Kats now bring you Part V, dealing with case management:L… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
Over on IP Finance, fellow Kat Neil muses about the IP dimensions of 3D printing while, on the 1709 Blog, Iona Harding updates us on the recent decision of Mr Justice Arnold (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in EMI and others v BSkyB and others on website blocking injunctions -- a subject which is starting to develop quite an interesting jurisprudence. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 12:18 am
Kat friend Aditya Gupta reports on an interesting judgment from the High Court of Delhi in this regard. [read post]
21 May 2021, 11:00 am
Indeed, it had originally appeared in a public place, where it was free to be photographed by the public, and subsequently made available in digital form by Banksy himself for public personal use – meaning that the mark could not fulfil the basic function of a trade mark of denoting goods’ shared source [Merpel purrs in approval at a 2011 Kat post being exhibited at ARW7].As a result, Full Colour Black claimed that there were two possible bad faith goals at play: one, to… [read post]
