Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 5141 - 5160 of 40,619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 8:54 pm by Ray Giblett (AU) and Timothy Chan (AU)
The appeal decision largely upholds the judgment of Chief Justice Allsop at first instance although the Full Federal Court arrived via a slightly different route. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The House of Bruar admitted infringement of the Amira boot, such that it was only the Regina boot that was at issue in the recent judgment of Miss Recorder Amanda Michaels in Fairfax & Favor v House of Bruar [2022] EWHC 689. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 7:01 am by Inga Kristina Trauthig
For example, after Ukraine banned the Russian Sputnik V vaccine in 2021, Russia increased personal attacks targeting key Ukrainian politicians, including President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian minister of health, on Telegram channels that were purportedly set up to share news by local journalists in Ukraine. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Katherine Rohde
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 7:27 am by Odia Kagan
Right now, a lot of companies are relying on large processors and unable to get either the information or the compliance concessions they want. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 7:18 am by Zak Gowen
  This could have an impact on large technology platforms, which continue to face increased scrutiny and pressure from antitrust enforcers and private plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  The decision was overturned on appeal (Secretary of State for Justice v A Local Authority & Ors (Rev2) [2021] EWCA Civ 1527). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The article’s authors are based in the UK and so the article is written from a UK perspective, but many of the article’s insights are largely applicable in the US as well. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]