Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 5141 - 5160 of 6,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by W. Casey Biggerstaff
Proponents of adhering strictly to classic (or “absolute”) neutrality rules, such as those outlined in the 1907 Hague Conventions V and XIII Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land and in Naval War, argue that certain types of support violates neutral States’ legal obligations of abstention (or non-participation) and impartiality and thereby constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But Kozinski was dissenting in United States v. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm by Richard M. Re
” Arguing for the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General John Bash advanced a kind of hybrid position. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
It was also settled before the case could be heard by a jury at the state level. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:41 am
In General Dynamics Land Systems v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Why copyright could not help to stop the distribution of the book in the United States? [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Why copyright could not help to stop the distribution of the book in the United States? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
At least Congress is no longer trying tell the courts to ignore large swaths of what is, in fact, the Supreme Law of the Land. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
At least Congress is no longer trying tell the courts to ignore large swaths of what is, in fact, the Supreme Law of the Land. [read post]