Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 5141 - 5160 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am by Kiera Flynn
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn contrasts yesterday’s decision in PLIVA v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court and law clerks who worked for the justices were less polished than they are now. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) – US: District Court New Jersey grants summary judgment of non-infringement in favour of Hospira, Teva and others concerning patent relating to Sanofi’s Eloxatin: Sanofi-Aventis v Sandoz (SmartBrief) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) (Patents4Life) General Europe’s ever changing landscape… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:17 pm
The decision at issue is Cipollone v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Yellow Book USA, Inc., 434 F.3d 1100 (8th Cir. 2006), didn’t require direct commercial competition between the parties, Aviation Charter, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99)   United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99)   United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Astra's Data Exclusivity prevents a European generic launch, until at least 2010.: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), Iressa (gefitinib) - Astrazeneca's Indian patent application rejected: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), Ziagen (Abacavir Hemisulfate Salt) -GSK's application [872/CAL/98; corresponding to Orange Book listed US6294540] opposed by Indian Network for People living with HIV/ AIDS and then withdrawn by GSK: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), Thai Public… [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sentencing Law Blog looks at Justice Stevens's recent comments in the USA Today, in which Stevens described as noteworthy the opinion he authored in Apprendi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]