Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2021, 1:06 pm
As a result of this reasoning, the court held that, at least at this preliminary stage, the three states were likely to prevail on the merits and that irreparable harm would follow in the absence of preliminary relief. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am
BROWN, Appellant v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:08 pm
The trial judge relied on a decision of Bromberg J in On Call Interpreters and Translators Agency Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2011] FCA 82 (On Call), in which it was held that section 12(3) would apply where an independent contractor provided personal services in an employment-like setting which was not of a domestic or private nature. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 10:27 pm
In Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:45 pm
(Dale Carpenter) Yesterday, in Doe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:21 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm
Gates & Major Gary V. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:55 pm
Here is the abstract: Though diversity remains a compelling state interest, recent rulings like Ricci v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 1:42 pm
Which brings us to the strange case of United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
United States, 481 US 412 (1987). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
Like many of the state breach notification laws, the Toomey Bill provides a substitute notification option that is available when providing direct notice would result in “excessive costs” to the covered entity (relative to the entity’s resources) or when the covered entity lacks sufficient contact information. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:51 am
To the tune of five different missives in Nelson v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am
I thought I was in the wrong state. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
On 2 December 2019, the Supreme Court heard the case of R v Hilton following certification by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release which meant that the claimant, Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
