Search for: "M v. M" Results 5141 - 5160 of 53,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm by Mark Murakami
Per the court, Charles Cooper was seriously injured while loading supplies onto the M/V INTERNATIONAL THUNDER during the course of his employment. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:25 am
Jane Lambert Yesterday I told the tale of the claimant who sought an interim injunction and ended uo with a court order to pay £27 million damages to the defendant (see "Be careful for what you wish for when seeking an interim injunction - it may cost you plenty! [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 12:31 am by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
Válidamente, puede crearse y es lo que se propone, se establezca una forma distinta de seguridad social ya no soportada por el pago derivado de una relación laboral formal, si no, que sea destinando el equivalente a tres puntos de IVA a volver autosuficiente el sistema de seguridad social en México. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
Emerging, blinking, from the dark confines of the pile of examination scripts that he has called his home for the past few weeks (which in the best cases have been a joy to behold and in the worst a veritable papier-mâché bunker of Babel), this Kat has spent a rather pleasant afternoon easing himself back into the real world again by digesting the latest judgment from Mr Justice Floyd: Cephalon v Orchid & Mylan [2011] EWHC 1591 (Pat).Cephalon and its subsidiaries… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:45 pm
I’m not doing reports but the cases are: Liverpool City Council, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon [2008] EWHC 1702 (Admin) on when and more specifically where a local authority’s duty to a ‘vulnerable young person’ arise under Children Act 1989. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:24 am by zola.support.team
Post-closing M&A Deals The first recent Delaware case regarding the enforceability of a noncompete clause in the context of an M&A deal is Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:48 am
A rare sighting of the Severin doctrine is on display in this Division 2 case released yesterday in the Natkin-Scott v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 3:43 pm by Lucy Reed
You may know it as Q v Q (although it isn’t). [read post]