Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 36,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2022, 6:27 am
The court found, among other things, that the defendants could not definitively show as a matter of law that: The State failed to diligently investigate the dumping in the Park. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 6:27 am
The court found, among other things, that the defendants could not definitively show as a matter of law that: The State failed to diligently investigate the dumping in the Park. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 6:27 am
The court found, among other things, that the defendants could not definitively show as a matter of law that: The State failed to diligently investigate the dumping in the Park. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm
By: James C. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:52 am
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
Here in Maryland, we have courts with the following choices:District Court: Lawyers must specify the upper end of what they are seeking, either (a) $5,000 (small claims cases); (b) $15,000 (for cases that can only be heard in the District Court); or (c) $30,000 (for cases that can be heard in the District or Circuit Court).Circuit Court: Lawyers typically tell the court if they are requesting a maximum of $30,000, or some amount higher than that. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
A very recent case indicates yet another significance, namely, whether deductible expenses incurred in the performance of the services are deductible in computing adjusted gross income, on Schedule C, or are deductible as employee business expenses, on Schedule A, subject to the 2-percent-of-adjusted-gross-income floor. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
By: Joseph C. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
If Congress wants to return to a world where social media immunity for libel (and other torts) turns on whether social media platforms act as common carriers, it can do so.[274] I'm not at all sure that's the right approach as a policy matter, especially since immunity from tort liability has helped many small and midsized online platforms thrive, and those platforms' editorial power has often been valuable. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R v M; R v C; R v T, heard 19 Jun 2017. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of In the matter of an application by Brigid McCaughey and another for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 2 – 3 February 2011, and R (on the application of GC) (FC) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent) and R (on the application of C) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 31 January – 1 February 2011, will be handed down on Wednesday 18 May 2011. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Acte Clair, Cat Claire or Claire de Lune? [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
By 2017, however, the term of current chair Jean-Pierre Blais will conclude and there will be mounting pressure to consider issues such as net neutrality, wireless competition, and broadcast regulation as a political matter. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm
IN THE MATTER OF I.L., C.L. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:10 pm
Cyr (2001) concerning the non-retroactivity of Congress's 1996 repeal of Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act is a matter of statutory interpretation that applies equally to all immigrants; and (2) whether Board of Immigration Appeals correctly applied the "statutory counterpart" rule for eligibility for § 212(c) relief.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (7th Cir.)Petition for certiorari [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:10 am
Defendant went into the security line at the Honolulu airport, but it was noted on his boarding pass that he presented "No ID" to get through security. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm
The use of “electronic devices” and “electronic memory devices” in the search warrant was not overbroad because it had to be interpreted in terms of the last limiting phrase, to locate an alleged missing person. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
In a probation search, the government must first have probable cause to believe the home is the defendant’s, a fact not in dispute in this case. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
This applies also to the embodiment of Claim 1 as granted, which is derivable from a combination of Claim 1 as filed with the embodiment disclosed in the paragraph bridging pages 22 and 23 of the application as filed. [2.3] Consequently, the further limitation of the melting point of the first polymer by the preferred range of 80-92°C, which leads to the subject-matter of Claim 1 of the main request, fulfils the requirements of A 123(2). [read post]
