Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 9,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In U.S. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:19 pm
However, Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher added, any testimony by Zayn Husayn, also known as Abu Zubaydah, would be subject to a national-security review, and it would not resolve the dispute over whether testimony by two CIA contractors who supervised the CIA’s torture program is protected by the “state secrets” privilege – the question at the center of United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Fairfax criminal lawyer again says legalize prostitution What justifies criminalizing prostitution other than America’s bipolar relationship with sex, which on the one hand still criminalizes adultery in the Virginia code (effectively invalidated by the United States Supreme Court in Texas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any S [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:08 pm
From Levitt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
Defendant’s Twitter account, Todd Levitt 2.0, is a parody that is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WTO panel releases decision in US complaint against China over its IP laws (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (ContentAgenda) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Michael Geist) (Law360) (Techdirt) (Patent Docs) WIPO press release: ‘Global economic slowdown impacts 2008 international patent filings’ (WIPO) (IPKat)… [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:47 pm
United States, 66 F.Supp. 663, 667 (E.D. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:44 am
United States, the decision holding that the use of infrared thermal imaging devices to detect a marijuana grow house constitutes a search and thus requires a warrant. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:04 am
I have now read through Judge Forrest’s opinion in Hedges—all 112 pages of it. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:22 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Indeed, the Aspen website’s promotional page for the book is still several weeks away. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:47 am
The justices have already ruled in Rasul v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:51 am
The government lawyers said that, if the Supreme Court were to rule in favor of the government in the pending case of United States v. [read post]
