Search for: "People v Johns"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 9,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
” And in an amicus brief in EFF’s case First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. the NSA case, Sens. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:45 pm
Like the fictitious soap operas All My Children and One Life to Live before it, the long-running real-life soap opera that was Bond v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:48 pm
A recent essay from law professor John McGinnis, titled “Machines v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am
Productions v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
(Henry Knox and John Jay also sent Washington their ideas.) [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Se trataba de John W. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:44 pm
This case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
In a case from Forsyth County, Superior Court Judge John O. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The case – Riley v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Before Goodridge v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am
Arguably when judges use their position to solicit contributions they misuse the judicial office and may cause people to feel intimidated or coerced into donating.[118] Judges might take advantage of the prestige of their office to solicit money for an organization, and this may occur even in circumstances where such conduct cannot be described as involving intimidation.[119] The prestige of the judicial office is not intended to be used as a vehicle to advance economic, financial, social,… [read post]
20 May 2014, 12:05 pm
In the decision, Whitehead v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:58 am
District Judge John E. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
There is an implicit message in this lawyerly turn from the People to the Court: popular sovereignty is dead in modern America.As John McGinnis suggests, identifying successful constitutional moments requires a lot more work than determining the presence or absence of an Article Five amendment. [read post]
