Search for: "People v. Roberts" Results 5141 - 5160 of 6,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:20 am by Tom Goldstein
In substance, it was that the court had voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm by Jason Neufeld
   Over the next 0.4 seconds the racer not only delivered massive blunt trauma, but the stainless steel propellers of each of the two V-8 500 HP engine/outdrives slashed through the girls. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
What this means for policy makers, business people, and "netizens". [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:32 am by Amy Howe
  The order came in one of the first gun rights cases to reach the justices in the wake of last year’s decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
"You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 1:34 pm
In 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall, in the case Marbury v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The answer to the above question is partially answered in the 1977, Texas Supreme Court case, Robert William Ford, Jr., et al. v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:36 pm by Kevin Funnell
"When people say that we are simply adopting the Barnett standard, that is simply not correct," said Robert Cook, a partner in the Hudson Cook law firm. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:50 pm by Amy Howe
Jones was convicted and sentenced to die in 1993 for the brutal murders of three people: Robert Weaver, Weaver’s seven-year-old daughter Tisha, and Katherine Gumina, Weaver’s grandmother. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:22 am by Alfred Brophy
 Tanner Kroeger and I are working on a paper on Harvard College v. [read post]