Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 5,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2008, 11:07 pm
The Supreme Court has decided the case of Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
Souter and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:50 am
Back when Snyder v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal by the Federal Communications Commission testing its power to ban even a single use of a vulgar word on radio and television (FCC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Moreover, some of the reasons that Powell identified for the framers' resistance to originalism were quite powerful. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:39 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
Circuit Court in Ollman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
Albany County Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
I. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:57 pm
Eric Turkewitz passed on this story from Thomas Swartz's New York Legal Update, on a February 21 New York appellate opinion, People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:48 am
While courts will use their powers to fashion the best relief possible in situations like this one, the ultimate responsibility for establishing a clearer, more consistent process lies with the agency. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Thomas McCarthy's seminal treatise on trademark law states his "who are you, what are you" test. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
And in Texas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Thompson, No. 07-1014 "Denial of a petition for federal habeas relief is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that: 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his state trial for murder; 2) the revised 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) violates Article III, the separation of powers, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
It almost sounds like a case the 11th Circuit reversed, U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 3:44 am
Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. 196, 203 (1995) (majority opinion by Justice Thomas) (quoting United States v. [read post]
