Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 41,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 9:32 pm
The judgment in the case of State of West Bengal v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 5:54 am
One of the more powerful new petitions for writ of certiorari is the case of Dow AgroSciences, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:45 pm
See Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
Instead, these are actually option agreements, with the seller obligated to hold open its offer to sell on the stated terms of the agreement, and the buyer holding the power to accept or reject the offer. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:40 am
” In the key case of South Dakota v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
The court's decision was simply that Congress lacked the enumerated power to regulate this behavior at all, and that dealing with such behavior should be left to the states (as with other noncommercial intrastate misbehavior, for instance the violence against women discussed in U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
The court's decision was simply that Congress lacked the enumerated power to regulate this behavior at all, and that dealing with such behavior should be left to the states (as with other noncommercial intrastate misbehavior, for instance the violence against women discussed in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
One of the great equalizers in the criminal justice system is supposed to be the discovery power possessed only by the defense, via Brady v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
The panel then stated that, to prevail, Sharif needed to allege that Prime and/or Walgreens either had or were dangerously likely to obtain monopoly power in a relevant market. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:26 am
”— Flashback #2: “People think that the president of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
The court began its analysis of the state-action doctrine by citing the seminal case of Parker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:00 pm
Supreme Court decision in MeadWestvaco Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:07 am
United States (07-9086) and Megginson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:18 pm
Congressional Brief : 87 Members of Congress signed this brief defending ICWA in the four principle arguments in the case State AG Brief : 23 states and the District of Columbia signed on to this brief, which highlights how ICWA allows and encourages tribal-state relations in the area of child welfare. [read post]
