Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 5141 - 5160 of 5,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 6:57 am
http://tinyurl.com/252fulq It’s Time to Take Email Archiving & Security Seriously - http://tinyurl.com/2a9njjj Judge: Privacy on Social Networking Sites is “Wishful Thinking” - http://tinyurl.com/2exe8vw Judge's Ruling Favors DOJ in E-mail Search Warrant Dispute - http://tinyurl.com/2ax8ed6 Magical, Mysterious E-Mail - http://tinyurl.com/2eub9fk Manage Compliance Process Matrix in Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) System Definition -… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:57 am by Jeff Gamso
  Even in time of war it has to be lawful, but none at all in peacetime unless the owner invited them in.Rich or poor, you can bar the door.The government simply cannot invade.Besides, it leads so naturally into the Fourth Amendment.The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,… [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Law enforcement cannot receive authorization to effectively intercept future communications through the “backdoor” of the general search and seizure regime in s. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 4:22 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Arizona drivers currently found guilty of DUI charges are required to install and use an ignition interlock device (IID). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:45 am by Jason Mazzone
The defendant argued that the Court lacked jurisdiction because the state court holding rested on an independent and adequate state law ground, the Michigan Constitution, which gave greater protection from searches and seizures than did the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 4:22 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Arizona drivers currently found guilty of DUI charges are required to install and use an ignition interlock device (IID). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:17 pm by John Rubin
The Court of Appeals recognized that a victim of a constitutional violation may sue for some constitutional violations, such as a violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures under the United States Constitution, but the right to sue for damages has not been extended to the deprivation of the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:57 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
If the unlawful search and seizure was material, your criminal defense attorney may file a motion to suppress that evidence. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:27 am by Randolph Rice
McNeely that taking blood from someone without their permission was a violation of their 4th Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:00 am by Pietro Franzina
What matters is the sheer existence of personal jurisdiction over the data controller, that is the ISP who receives the warrant, which would enable criminal prosecutors to unilaterally order seizure of the data stored abroad, without necessarily seeking cooperation thorough official channels such as Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:23 am by Kyle Persaud
Such officers shall have the powers and authority now and hereafter vested by law in other peace officers, including the right and power of search and seizure, except the serving or execution of civil process, and the right and power to investigate and prevent crime and to enforce the criminal laws of this state. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
 Indeed, people are listening.THE FOURTH AMENDMENTThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Oh, and Barnes wasn’ t that court’s only decision on search and seizure. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:13 am by otmseo
This includes questioning the legality of searches and seizures, the credibility of witnesses, and the reliability of forensic evidence. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 am by Lewis Gainor
The lawyers also argued Form 8300 violates the warrant requirement of the 4th Amendment (as an unreasonable search and seizure), the privilege against self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment, and the accused’s right to counsel of his choosing provided by the 6th Amendment to the Constitution. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:59 pm by Kevin
These decisions have primarily been related to Fourth Amendment ‘search and seizure’ cases; however they are generally accepted in a variety of other contexts. [read post]