Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a decision in University of Maryland Medical System v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
State Farm is the granddaddy of Katrina litigation, or perhaps more accurately, the Mother of All (Insurance) Battles. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
State Farm is the granddaddy of Katrina litigation, or perhaps more accurately, the Mother of All (Insurance) Battles. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:14 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an decision in State of Texas v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 2:15 pm
The bench heard the plea of a 17-year old Delhi student, Aditya Dubey (Aditya Dubey v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:48 am
Our paper has some suggestions, specifically for law libraries, state legislatures, and the courts. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:41 pm
Thus Story’s statement in Martin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:05 am
Sofa Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
First, I read a provocative essay by Paul Butler, "Poor People Lose: Gideon and the Critique of Rights," in the Yale Law Journal's most recent issue, which contains over twenty articles (all available for free download) by law professors and lawyers reflecting on the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
At the end of the 19th century, the United States government was much smaller than it is today. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The Federal Court would make legal history in the defamation battle between Sydney MP Alex Greenwich and former NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham if it empanelled a jury to hear the case, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:27 am
The case of Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Back in mid-January (sorry for the delay in reporting this decision, dear IPKat readers), Mr Justice Arnold handed down his judgment in the long-standing easy trade mark battle: W3 Ltd v Easygroup Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 7.The core issue was whether the sign “EasyRoommate” and its variants which were owned by the Claimant, W3, infringed any of the the easyGroup's EU trade marks. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
And in People Express Airlines v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:38 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
This is because the two opposing experts are going have to testify about the state of knowledge of the person skilled in the art with regard to Baldwin's Rules for ring closure. [read post]
