Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 5141 - 5160 of 14,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Regina Davis Moss stated: [Watts’ experience] is a grave example of how Black women and their bodies face legal threats simply for existing. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The AIRC Court said that when, as in Article I, section 4, the Constitution refers to “Legislature” as a body that regulates or makes policy—rather than a body that makes an up-or-down ratification decision (as it does for federal constitutional amendments under Article V of the Constitution) or chooses among particular candidates themselves (as state legislatures did before the 17th Amendment required “direct” election of U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:16 am by Carolina Pina
The EGC states that a Designation of Origin can be comprised of a traditional non-geographical name designating a foodstuff. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Here is the only New Hampshire criminal libel appellate decision in the past 100 years, State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 8:03 am by Dennis Crouch
And in 1976 [the year FSIA was passed], the state of that body of law was clear: A “taking of property” could be “wrongful under international law” only where a state deprived “an alien” of property. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Body Masters Sports Industries, Inc., 784 A.2d 1178, 1183 (N.H.2001), the New Hampshire Supreme Court rejected the Third Restatement because of the alternative design issue. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm by Aparajita Lath
 The Hon’ble Single Judge of the Delhi High Court relied primarily on two decisions with regard to comparative advertising - De Beers Abrasive v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Both the immediate stakes and the lineup in Murthy v. [read post]