Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 14,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Among other provisions, the new statute adopts rules promulgated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), a U.N. body that has long been concerned with promoting the enforceability of arbitration agreements and electronic contracts in its member countries. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Chief Justice Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
The Hawktalk blog has a post “Health and Social Work public bodies do not need to rely on data subject consent for the processing of personal data”. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Here is a brief excerpt from the archival record of the case:"City of Harrodsburg v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:17 am
Major players should proactively work with regulatory bodies to help set a more stringent bar for supplements. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
It draws on his work over the arc of his mandate and its object is to summarize the basic human rights obligations of States on environmental matters, as they have been clarified by human rights bodies. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:02 am
There has been some discussion as to whether the ONS re-classification might affect whether associations are public bodies for the purposes of public law and human rights (as in Weaver). [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:07 am
Yeldo v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:38 am
A second Court case, Reichle v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 7:46 am
Yet in a way, for the ancient leaders of the United States and Cuba (and the old men in younger bodies within Russia), that return would be a relief as well--this is a state of affairs they know well and and well know how to operate (e.g., here). [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:16 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:07 pm
But that is suicide for a state which requires its able bodied population if it is to crawl put of the economic paralysis--even with the aid of a moderately successful Mariel Special Economic Zone. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:52 am
Seuss Enters. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
Richards sought bond funding to expand prison capacity far beyond what was necessary to accommodate federal prison reform litigation (Ruiz v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 6:38 am
In that case, the court quoted from a 2009 EEOC Compliance Manual, which stated that while being overweight is not generally an impairment, “severe obesity, which has been defined as body weight more than 100% over the norm, is clearly an impairment. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
