Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 27,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
German Federal Agencies Publish Privacy and IT Security Requirements for Digital Health Applications
7 May 2020, 12:04 am
Scope of application The DiGAV applies when the provider of a digital health application seeks reimbursement from German state health schemes. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:18 am
Since its inception, the federal judiciary has insisted that each judge on a collegial body may state his or her individual views on the question presented. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:02 am
From Duggar v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm
However, in two 2019 rulings – the Marchand v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:44 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:09 am
Gordon v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
State, No. 2018-KA-01341-COA (Miss. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:57 pm
Among other things, the Bulletin announces that the Division “expects” carriers to take steps to (i) forego prior authorization review or concurrent review for any scheduled surgeries and health admissions at acute care and mental health hospitals for 60 days (or the end of the emergency period if the public health emergency ends prior to the 60 day period); (ii) devote carrier resources to assist hospitals with discharge planning; (iii) provide hospitals additional time to respond to… [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:40 pm
26 CFR § 1.1471-5(i)(2) states that, for federal tax income purposes, an “expanded affiliated group” is generally defined in accordance with the principles of the IRS Code to mean one or more chains of entities connected through ownership by a common parent entity. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:30 am
In the 2017 case, State v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
The main body of statutes and laws governing civil law are set out in the Napoleonic Code (Code civil des Français) (the “Civil Code“), established under Napoleon I in 1804 and the Code de Commerce, the French commercial code. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 10:28 pm
Polk County Bd. of Review v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 2:08 pm
Tubbs v. [read post]
