Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 5141 - 5160 of 133,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2012, 9:37 am by Lorene Park
Although there are variations among these states, the laws typically provide that an employer may not prohibit an employee who has a valid concealed carry permit from keeping a firearm in the employee’s vehicle as long as the vehicle is locked and the firearm is not visible. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Church and the priest appealed, but in a 2-1 decision in Mayeux v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In Ohio District Council, Inc. of the Assemblies of God v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
 In Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 708 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2013), in December 2010, when the Ozaltins stopped cohabitating in Turkey, the Mother took the children to reside with her in New York City. ) Petitioner-appellee Nurettin Ozaltin ("the Father") brought suit seeking the return of his two minor children to Turkey, as well as an order enforcing his rights under Turkish law to visit the children as long as they stayed in the United States with their mother, respondent-appellant… [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
  This Court had held in Stolt-Nielsen that a court may not compel classwide arbitration when an agreement is silent on the availability of such arbitration. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Just as one might think that Congress cannot impose deadlines (except in the text of an amendment itself) because the Article V process says nothing about deadlines, so one might conclude that states may not rescind a prior ratification because the Article V process gives them only one power: to ratify. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
Factors to be weighed in the balance Instead, the Irish Supreme Court stated that other factors may be considered and weighed in the balance by a court in considering how matters are to be held most fairly pending a trial and in recognising the possibility that there may be no trial. [read post]