Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 13,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
On Thursday 9 June it will hear the compliance cost issues in the cases of Price Waterhouse Coopers v Saad Investments Company Ltd & Anor (Bermuda) and Singularis Holdings Ltd v Price Waterhouse Coopers (Bermuda). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
In particular the Court referred to an email from the third defendant to the fifth defendant thanking him for sending some some information statistics (related to pricings) which stated: "As mentioned to Andrew I don't think you can formally put these in any presentation as we would obviously be breaching confidentiality but would suggest that we keep in our back pocket to show on a nudge nudge wink wink basis to interested parties. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
As the Seventh Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:24 am
During the relevant time period, the employer had 39 drilling rigs capable of operation spread across three states. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:13 pm
Only Judges Price and Johnson joined Alcala's dissent in that one. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm
Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm
Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm
Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
Blanks v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
Blanks v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
Blanks v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:21 pm
The SRS Acquiom Study reveals that separate indemnities are most commonly used to protect purchasers from (i) taxation liability (78% of the deals reviewed in 2015), (ii) payments to dissenting shareholders (72%), (iii) the accuracy of closing certificates (69%), (iv) transaction expenses (43%), (v) litigation (35%), (vi) fraud and wilful misrepresentation (33%) and (vii) purchase price adjustments (33%). [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:44 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:52 am
For instance, if there was a fire after the sales contract was signed and the condo is gutted, then the buyer may still be legally responsible for paying the seller the full purchase price as stated in their contract. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am
May 19, 2016) (notice of removal of putative class action alleging defendant internet providers’ “Price for Life” promotion was misleading because the providers’ price guarantee expired after one year). [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:14 am
See Richardson v. [read post]
