Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 11,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
" The California high court decision struck down proposed state legislation seeking to ban same-sex marriage on the grounds the initiative violated the California constitution.Six months later, in yet another change of course, the California electorate (narrowly) approved Proposition 8, defining marriage as between opposite-sex couples only. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am
In its lengthy opinion, the court looked at the partnership agreement and the governing partnership statute — neither of which resolved the deadlock over retention of partnership counsel — as well as rules of ethics, state bar opinions, and California case law. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:31 am
These are therefore not barred. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
The Committee for the Rule of Law, established to oppose a California rule permitting courts to “depublish” opinions (an issue I had a run-in with in a federal district court), has a collection of law review articles challenging unpublished opinions. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am
State, 128 Nev. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
California. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
Central to the court’s decision was the broad duty to defend standard that triggers a defense when there is a potential for coverage or where the complaint could be amended to state a covered claim. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:31 am
LEXIS 24395 (SD CA, March 9, 2011), a California federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with his claim that prison officials destroyed his religious books.In Washington-El v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
Central to the court’s decision was the broad duty to defend standard that triggers a defense when there is a potential for coverage or where the complaint could be amended to state a covered claim. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
And based upon this (flawed) premise, the argument proceeds to hold that federal courts should have broad latitude to oversee and reverse state-court determinations of the meaning of state law, whenever federal courts feel state courts are, by invoking state constitutions or in other ways, being insufficiently respectful to the work-product of elected state legislatures. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:56 am
The second-largest state court in the nation — Chicago's Cook County — offers online searches of civil cases without a fee. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
In this version of "Mother, May I", instead of getting sent to the starting point for forgetting to say the magic words, the defendant gets to spend countless years behind bars as a guest of the state unless and until he gets a lawyer...which, remember...if he has ever self-represented - he may not be entitled to have ...or even know he may have given up - to ask whether the Court should reconsider its decision in Faretta v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:05 pm
The Attain policies contained standard professional services exclusions, which on their face purported to bar coverage for professional property management services. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
Similarly, the court alread held that the April 2006 letter did provide inquiry notice, so anyone who received that letter more than 4 years before the start of the action has time-barred claims. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
Caroline is a Chicago native, former Michigan State volleyball player, and recent admitee to the California bar with particular interest in the First Amendment.] [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:46 am
The attorney also claimed that she spoke to someone at the State Bar ethics hotline regarding the issue, although according to the appellate court, there was no indication that she discussed the protective order. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:53 pm
With the assistance of the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project, Scott has since had his conviction erased by the Virginia Supreme Court. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
Barnes (University of California, Irvine) [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
Mazda, the Supreme Court held that state-law damages claims seeking to hold an automaker accountable for its vehicle-design choices were not barred by federal regulation of motor vehicles. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
