Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 7,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that Hale had standing to sue. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Walgreens then offered to transfer Patterson back to the position he had previously held as a customer-care representative. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Similar to Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Proposed Model Rule 5.4 would have permitted a lawyer to be “employed by an organization in which a financial interest is held or managerial authority is exercised by a non-lawyer . . . but only if the terms of the relationship provide in writing that”: (a) There is no interference with the lawyer’s independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship; (b) Information relating to representation of a client is protected as required by Rule 1.6; (c)… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
Bement & Sons v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
It was held that the letter was not defamatory of the claimants at common law and the defamation claim dismissed [26-27]. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Pyett, No. 07-581- Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clause - (From SCOTUSwiki): Justice Thomas's majority opinion held that nothing in either the National Labor Relations Act, which controls collective bargaining agreements made on behalf of union members, or the ADEA forbids unions from mandating arbitration to resolve statutory discrimination claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 4:57 pm
It nonetheless argues that the court does not need to grant review now because the justices recently held in Harrow v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:21 pm
Alvarez-Perez’ trial was held outside the permitted 70-day period. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
Pennsylvania, where the majority, in an opinion by Justice Thomas, held that the Trump administration’s evisceration of the contraceptive mandate (requiring no-cost contraception for all women) through broad religious and moral exemptions was supported by RFRA. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito The joint opinion of the four dissenters includes the following remark about the Court's recent congressional power cases: The Lesson of [New York v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Thomas L. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
In Flowers v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am
” Hovey v. [read post]
