Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 2:38 pm
United States (District Court docket 13-777) will be heard by U.S. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
Judges who like to rhyme: United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:29 pm
White had legitimate reasons for coming to the United States. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:22 pm
United States. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
But that doesn't mean this outlier will have been the last case in which a United States district court with a FRAND contract (and rate-setting) case before it precludes a patent holder from enforcing potential or actual ITC remedies. [read post]
20 May 2013, 2:30 am
United States. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:29 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 Heard: June 26, 2012 Decided: May 14, 2013 Docket No. 11-5113-cv(L), 12-491-cv(XAP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, THE VULCAN SOCIETY, INC., MARCUS HAYWOOD, CANDIDO NUNEZ, ROGER GREGG, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:01 am
Lerner, who heads the IRS’s tax-exemption division, described the targeting campaign as a misguided attempt to deal with a wave of applications after the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:00 am
On April 15, 2013 the United States Supreme Court heard submissions on whether human genes are patentable products of innovation or unpatentable products of nature. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm
Unfortunately, the consensus of United States legal authority on what is generic rather than descriptive, and vice-versa, has become somewhat discordant. . . . [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:38 am
Less than 5 years after giving the industry the rigid machine-or-transformation test, which was ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court, five of the ten judges that heard CLS Bank v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 8:25 pm
He did so with vigor, and for the next five years lectured on Indian reforms all over the United States. [read post]
11 May 2013, 8:25 pm
He did so with vigor, and for the next five years lectured on Indian reforms all over the United States. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
Clarifying the holding in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
Federal Circuit Decides Egyptian GoddessOn Monday, September 22, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided the much anticipated design patent case – Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:04 am
Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1012-1013 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986), and United States v. [read post]
