Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 5141 - 5160
of 9,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Barrett marks the seventy-fifth anniversary of Harlan Fiske Stone’s ascension to the position of Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
” Mark Frost for petitioner (Art Lien) Arguing for the United States as amicus curiae supporting Heffernan, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ginger D. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:01 pm
The first of two criminal cases involving Halal food exports, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
§1052(e)(4) a trademark that is primarily merely a surname cannot register on the Principal Register of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) absent a showing of acquired distinctiveness under §2(f), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:39 am
The case, New York Times v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
This provision was rendered inoperative by Loving v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
__X__ It does not concisely state all issues or points presented for review. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can generally benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines, “marks another episode in the continuing saga about how to treat the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” and that “[b]y failing to explain what ‘advisory’ Guidelines actually are, and by making inconsistent statements about the role of the Guidelines at sentencing, the Court has left… [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
” After Gregg v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
The Respondent in the first case has filed an ACPA action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Civil Action No. 09-3939 challenging the UDRP decision. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:23 am
v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
The document emanates from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and is titled "Notice of Request for Comments on the Feasibility of Placing Economically Significant Patents Under a Secrecy Order and the Need to Review Criteria Used in Determining Secrecy Orders Related to National Security". [read post]
