Search for: "United States v. Warne" Results 5141 - 5160 of 5,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Could it be that the proposed Regulation will cause standard contributors to relocate standard-related R&D and standards development outside the EU, as Müller warns? [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It marked the United States’ largest military campaign to date, involving 1.2 million soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:52 pm by Andrea Matwyshyn
Power Ventures and United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
--An action under paragraph (1)(A) shall be governed under the rules and procedures set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
October 13, 2022 | Negotiating Prices with Drug Manufacturers | The Inflation Reduction Act aims to constrain rapidly increasing drug prices in the United States. [read post]
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for example, has focused on ESG by investigating and taking action against companies that tout business practices such as consideration of environmental sustainability, but fail, in practice, to live up to their claims. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:20 am
Despite the hullabaloo surrounding the trial, the focus should be on the defendants, the charge and the verdict in HKSAR v Ng Gordon Ching Hang & Ors [2024] HKCFI 1468. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  He issued a comparable warning in a similarly unusual ICO Statement issued on December 1lth, 2017, stating: “On this and other points [of this ICO statement] where the application of expertise and judgment is expected, I believe that gatekeepers and others, including securities lawyers, accountants and consultants, need to focus on their responsibilities. [read post]